Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Resolution: Done
-
Bugzilla Migration
-
None
-
Operating System: All
Platform: All
-
5952
Description
there's value in supporting v4 next-hops for v6 routes and vice-versa (e.g. for use-cases where we use LISP encaps but BGP control plane, or for 6PE/6VPE with v4 next-hops).
currently this fails due to precondition checks. Have taken them out locally and that fixes the issue so will propose a patch now (but best to have a bug for tracking?)