[BGPCEP-329] updateLsp () in class org.opendaylight.bgpcep.pcep.topology.provider.AbstractTopologySessionListener doesnt match "PCEP Extensions for Stateful PCE draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-11" Created: 09/Dec/15 Updated: 03/Mar/19 Resolved: 20/Jan/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | bgpcep |
| Component/s: | PCEP |
| Affects Version/s: | Bugzilla Migration |
| Fix Version/s: | Bugzilla Migration |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Geng Xingyuan | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 4744 |
| Description |
|
R(Remove - 1 bit): On PCRpt messages the R Flag indicates that the |
| Comments |
| Comment by Geng Xingyuan [ 24/Dec/15 ] |
|
protected final synchronized void updateLsp(final MessageContext ctx, final L id, final String lspName, final String name; LOG.debug("Saved LSP {} with name {}", id, name); final ReportedLsp previous = this.lspData.get(name); // If this is an unsolicited update. We need to make sure we retain the metadata already present else { rlb.setMetadata(this.nodeState.getLspMetadata(name)); } //FIX!!! should check R flag in this place!!!!!!!! } |
| Comment by Milos Fabian [ 05/Jan/16 ] |
|
Input parameter "remove" represents "R" flag. The flag is later treated in "makeBeforeBreak(...)" as described in pce-stateful draft. Are you experiencing any problems with LSP removal? If so, could you please describe the use-case? |
| Comment by Milos Fabian [ 20/Jan/16 ] |
|
Insufficient information provided in a bug report. |