[CONTROLLER-1560] Can't GET default module configuration by RESTCONF Created: 24/Oct/16  Updated: 25/Jul/23

Status: Confirmed
Project: controller
Component/s: blueprint
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: New Feature
Reporter: Tomas Janciga Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Unresolved Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified
Environment:

Operating System: All
Platform: All

Attachments: Text File file_7012.txt    

 Description   

GET requests for the current configuration of blueprint modules don't work with default configuration.
But it starts to work when the default configuration has been changed (e.g. by RESTCONF PUT request).
Example of blueprint XML and Yang model attached.

Example of the GET reqest URL and response body:

GET: localhost:8181/restconf/config/onem2m-plugin-loader-config:onem2m-plugin-loader-config

{
"errors": {
"error": [

{ "error-type": "application", "error-tag": "data-missing", "error-message": "Request could not be completed because the relevant data model content does not exist " }

]
}
}

 Comments   
Comment by Tomas Janciga [ 24/Oct/16 ]

Attachment file_7012.txt has been added with description: Yang model and Blueprint XML

Comment by Tom Pantelis [ 04/Jul/17 ]

Default configuration is just that - it is only provided to the app if there is no data in the datastore and thus, if not present in the datastore, it won't be reported via restconf.

Comment by Robert Varga [ 14/Nov/18 ]

tjanciga is this still present in Neon? If so, can you provide steps to reproduce?

Comment by Tom Pantelis [ 14/Nov/18 ]

This is referring to the clustered-app-config BP extension - when provided with a default config, it is not returned from RESTCONF b/c it is not actually written to the DS. For RESTCONF to report it would require some hook somewhere in the DS.

Comment by Robert Varga [ 14/Nov/18 ]

... or an automagically-populated DS shard (assuming DOMDataTreeService).

Comment by Tom Pantelis [ 14/Nov/18 ]

yes - that would be the hook...

Generated at Wed Feb 07 19:55:51 UTC 2024 using Jira 8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d.