[DOCS-144] Path Computation client for sulfur shows error "no source vertex" . Graph is displayed correct Created: 24/May/22 Updated: 03/Jun/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | docs |
| Component/s: | General, User Guide |
| Affects Version/s: | Silicon |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | High |
| Reporter: | Aseem Rai | Assignee: | Luis Gomez |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | pcep | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
|
| Priority: | High |
| Description |
|
version: sulfur Log output of path computation client 15:41:49.976 INFO [qtp1119293142-180] Got Path Computation Service request Graph Output REST : /restconf/operational/graph:graph-topology Attached : response_graph.json Path computation Request , |
| Comments |
| Comment by Aseem Rai [ 25/May/22 ] |
|
Hi Please help to understand what could be the reason for this issue ? If there is something to do with the configuration or packages installed , please let mek now
thanks Aseem. |
| Comment by Olivier Dugeon [ 01/Jun/22 ] |
|
Hello, Like for BGPCEP-1008, it seems that the problem comes from the graph which is formed with wrong VertexID. Thus, the Path computation algorithm is unabled to determine source and destination vertices on the graph and failed to compute a path. Here, I saw that you are using IS-IS as routing protocol which I validated. Thus, I suspect a problem with Decimal64 (already reported and corrected) in Sulfur SR1. I'll check on my side and verify the problem. |
| Comment by Aseem Rai [ 03/Jun/22 ] |
|
Thanks odd22 From BGPCEP-1008, I have also collected the ask of RPC get constrained path output and I will paste it to that issue today . Do you also know why the PCE Server closes connection due to this and is there any setting/configuration to avoid that to happen.
Aseem. |
| Comment by Olivier Dugeon [ 03/Jun/22 ] |
|
Hello, The PCEP session closed due to the exception which is not catched correctly. In fact, I would call Path Computation within a Future<> but it is not working as expected. Thus, I should verify that nothing goes wrong which normally the code done. But, it seems you discover a new situation where Path computation is unable to compute a path and where JLNPE is raised. Once problem determined, I will propose a global patch. Regards Olivier |