[GBP-177] Handling of "any" in ConditionSet does not fit the model Created: 17/Jul/15 Updated: 12/Jul/16 Resolved: 12/Jul/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | groupbasedpolicy |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | unspecified |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Konstantin Blagov | Assignee: | Konstantin Blagov |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 4013 |
| Description |
|
In ConditionSet class the "any" property is not a simple Set, but a Set of Sets: private final Set<? extends Set<ConditionName>> any; It seems not to fit the YANG model, where all 3 condition subsets (all, any, none) are just lists: grouping has-conditions { key "name"; uses label; |
| Comments |
| Comment by Keith Burns [ 11/Oct/15 ] |
|
Does you current PS https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/24231/5 address this? If so can you close this as a duplicate of the other bug on Conditions? |
| Comment by Konstantin Blagov [ 12/Oct/15 ] |
|
(In reply to Keith Burns from comment #1) No, I only discovered this unfitting while working on that PS. There, I deal with the current impl. as is. |