thousands of RFC7950 violation log messages in karaf.log (INTDIST-109)

[INTDIST-115] clean up RFC7950 violations for misc project Created: 24/Mar/20  Updated: 27/Mar/20  Resolved: 27/Mar/20

Status: Resolved
Project: integration-distribution
Component/s: None
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Sub-task Priority: Medium
Reporter: Jamo Luhrsen Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Duplicate Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified


 Description   

69 messages below coming from different projects that weren't quick to identify when
creating the other sub-tasks for INTDIST-109. I think some will fall in to existing projects,
like OFP or BGP. These are coming from a CSIT job running compatible-with-all:

2020-03-23T10:46:05,366 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,367 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,367 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,368 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,379 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,380 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:06,801 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,023 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,777 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,778 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,759 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,760 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,761 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)withdrawn-routes does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:225:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,761 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)nlri does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:228:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,762 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)segments does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:142:16]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,762 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:166:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,763 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)extended-communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:169:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,764 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)withdrawn-routes does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:225:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)nlri does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:228:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)segments does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:142:16]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:166:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,766 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)extended-communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:169:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,769 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,771 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,771 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,772 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,772 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,773 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,773 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,774 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,315 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)aggregated-flow-statistics does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:154:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,369 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)batch-update-groups does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:79:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,673 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)experimenter-core-message-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:21:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,687 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)packet-queues does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:36:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,883 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,885 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,891 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)batch-update-meters does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:85:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,975 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,976 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,990 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)control-message does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:25:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,998 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)error does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:138:9]
2020-03-23T10:46:11,167 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:298:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:11,170 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)dst-subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at null:302:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,150 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)pmsi-tunnel}]:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,152 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)pmsi-tunnel}]:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,933 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)opendaylight-port-types}]:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,092 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)opendaylight-port-types}]:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,383 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,383 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)opendaylight-topology-view}]:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,385 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)opendaylight-topology-view}]:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,485 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)control-message does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)odl-lisp-sb}]:25:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,793 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)error does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)ietf-restconf}]:138:9]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,192 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,192 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,202 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,257 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)odl-mappingservice}]:298:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,259 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)dst-subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)odl-mappingservice}]:302:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,267 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)cluster-admin}]:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,268 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)cluster-admin}]:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,406 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)aggregated-flow-statistics does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)opendaylight-flow-statistics}]:154:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,674 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)experimenter-core-message-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)sal-experimenter-mp-message}]:21:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,677 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)batch-update-meters does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)sal-meters-batch}]:85:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,848 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)batch-update-groups does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)sal-groups-batch}]:79:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,852 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-computation}]:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,853 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-computation}]:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,875 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)packet-queues does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  this is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)sal-queue}]:36:12]


 Comments   
Comment by Luis Gomez [ 24/Mar/20 ]

jluhrsen This is nothing to do with distribution, ODL projects should fix their yang models if they care about these logs. You should probably move the tickets to the respective projects.

Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 24/Mar/20 ]

agreed that this is a per-project kind of thing, but I was trying to find a way to group everything together
since they are all related to the same problem. And since we see it the worst in our CSIT running our
distribution compatible-with-all, I created a parent Jira INTTEST-109. But, creating sub-tasks for that
does not let me put them in their individual projects. I'll think what's best to do and take care of it.

Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 27/Mar/20 ]

Turns out this is because of yangtools checks being too aggressive and that project
will try to take care of this:

https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1090

Generated at Wed Feb 07 20:02:48 UTC 2024 using Jira 8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d.