[INTTEST-7] WaitForFailure keywords are called with named (as opposed to positional) arguments Created: 19/May/17 Updated: 19/Oct/17 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | integration-test |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Vratko Polak | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Description |
|
And WaitUtils do not support that yet. Either fix all the call sites, or add support for named arguments to WaitUtils. Example: [0]. In this case, it would be best to expect a specific failure message from the inner keyword, instead of waiting for any failure. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Vratko Polak [ 19/May/17 ] |
|
> WaitUtils Sorry, WaitForFailure is the library in question here. |