[MDSAL-62] Rename Opendaylight specific YANG modules to format odl-{$module} Created: 13/Nov/14 Updated: 19/Aug/19 |
|
| Status: | Confirmed |
| Project: | mdsal |
| Component/s: | models |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | ||
| Reporter: | Tony Tkacik | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Description |
|
Config subsystem modules should follow naming convention: odl-{$module}-cfg for configuration of components Opendaylight specific MD-SAL related models should follow conventions: odl-{$module} |
| Comments |
| Comment by Carol Sanders [ 04/May/15 ] |
|
This bug is part of the project to Move all ADSAL associated component bugs to ADSAL |
| Comment by Ankit agarwal [ 11/May/15 ] |
|
Hi carol, can you please tell me know if i can work on this bug individually and if yes, I suppose making naming changes in POM of these config modules will be enough. |
| Comment by Tony Tkacik [ 11/May/15 ] |
|
Hi Ankit,
|
| Comment by Vratko Polak [ 18/Oct/16 ] |
|
> odl-{$module}-cfg I would recommend $module to be decomposed as $project-$functionality Simplified example: odl-bgpcep-bgp for a mdsal module, odl-bgpcep-bgp-cfg for corresponding config subsystem module. Note that ideally this should also apply to fundamental ODL modules, for example not "config", but "odl-controller-config". |