[NETCONF-325] odl-netconf-clustered-topology not adding to entity-owners Created: 28/Nov/16  Updated: 15/Mar/19  Resolved: 01/Dec/16

Status: Resolved
Project: netconf
Component/s: netconf
Affects Version/s: None
Fix Version/s: None

Type: Bug
Reporter: Vratko Polak Assignee: Unassigned
Resolution: Cannot Reproduce Votes: 0
Labels: None
Remaining Estimate: Not Specified
Time Spent: Not Specified
Original Estimate: Not Specified
Environment:

Operating System: All
Platform: All


External issue ID: 7257

 Description   

This Bug mostly manifests as 404 error in cluster-stress job.

Appearance is quite complicated.
This Bug is not present in Beryllium [0] and it was not present in early Carbon [1]. In Boron, it is present both in only job as 404 [2] and in all job as data without netconf-related entity [3]. But in recent Carbon, the netconf-related entity is present in all job [4], while the only job still leads to 404 [5].

This particular check has 3 minute timeout, so a timing issue is not probable, and karaf.log does not contain anything suspicious.

[0] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-only-beryllium/25/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k2-k5-k3-k1-k3
[1] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-only-carbon/3/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k2-k5-k3-k1-k4-k1
[2] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-only-boron/49/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k1-k5-k3-k1-k3
[3] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-all-boron/63/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k1-k5-k3-k1-k4-k1
[4] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-all-carbon/62/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k1-k5-k3-k1-k4-k1
[5] https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/netconf-csit-3node-cluster-stress-only-carbon/122/archives/log.html.gz#s1-s1-t3-k2-k1-k5-k3-k1-k3



 Comments   
Comment by Vratko Polak [ 01/Dec/16 ]

After discussion with developers I concluded that the current implementation has no topology manager, so there really is no manager owner to report.
Effectively, all members act as managers and each member spawns one candidate per device.

Generated at Wed Feb 07 20:14:43 UTC 2024 using Jira 8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d.