[NETCONF-398] Carbon: odl respond with http status 401 in various suites Created: 11/Apr/17 Updated: 15/Mar/19 Resolved: 18/Apr/17 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | netconf |
| Component/s: | restconf-nb |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Peter Gubka | Assignee: | Jakub Toth |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| External issue ID: | 8209 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
This is a kind of general problem, because more than one suite enters the state when a node starts to respond with http response 401 (unauthorized). Few bugs may already be opened for problems related to the node isolation, but these problems result in odl node response 401. Suite: Rpc Provider Partition And Heal
Suite: Action Provider Partition And Heal Suite: Partition And Heal (Clustering Singleton) This may not be the single problem, but all is related to node isolation process. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Tom Pantelis [ 11/Apr/17 ] |
|
401 points to an HTTP authentication issue, ie AAA. This is not related to clustering. Perhaps AAA is somehow affected by node isolation or it's an issue on the robot side (perhaps it's not sending the proper authentication header?). Also does it fail fast if it doesn't immediately receive 501? If so, perhaps retrying the request will eventually return 501. |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 12/Apr/17 ] |
|
Robot hadn't been receiving 401 few weeks ago. Auth parameters for a particular http session are set at the suite start and remain the same for the suite duration. There is practically no place where to make a mistake on robot side. |
| Comment by Tom Pantelis [ 12/Apr/17 ] |
|
Either way it's not a clustering issue. I would suggest moving this to the integration project and first debugging it on the robot side. (In reply to Peter Gubka from comment #2) |
| Comment by Robert Varga [ 12/Apr/17 ] |
|
Moving to restconf for now. Can this be related to |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 13/Apr/17 ] |
|
(In reply to Robert Varga from comment #4) It can be related to it. |