[NETCONF-682] RFC8040 compliance - wrong URI returns incorrect HTTP status Created: 04/May/20 Updated: 07/Jul/20 Resolved: 07/Jul/20 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | netconf |
| Component/s: | netconf |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Aluminium, Magnesium SR2, Sodium SR4 |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Lukas Baca | Assignee: | Lukas Baca |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| Description |
|
In every version of draft and RFC, the return code for "data-missing" is 409: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-bierman-netconf-restconf-04 https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-netconf-restconf-18 https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8040 However in ODL, the return code for "data-missing" is 404: HTTP status returned: 404 Not Found
{
"errors": {
"error": [
{
"error-message": "Schema node tx-frequenc does not exist in module.",
"error-tag": "data-missing",
"error-type": "protocol"
}
]
}
}
In ticket from 2014 (https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/CONTROLLER-671), return code changed from 409 to 404: The base specification listed the error code to be 409, which is in However nothing changed in RFC draft since 2014 (e.g. errata was rejected): https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5565
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Robert Varga [ 04/May/20 ] |
|
This is tracked in an errata, https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid5565 , which has been rejected. |
| Comment by Lukas Baca [ 04/May/20 ] |
|
sorry typo in commit. Problem is now is here 404 but every draft have 409 We want change this value to 409 |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 04/May/20 ] |
|
rovarga, the task here is to return 409 for the data-missing case which we see outlined in the 8040 RFC Right now we are getting 404. The bierman draft also has 409 for data-missing. I didn't really follow |
| Comment by Robert Varga [ 06/May/20 ] |
|
jluhrsen the core argument based on HTTP/1.1 (https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7231) and the initial response is here: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netconf/hkVDdHK4xA74NgvXzWP0zObMiyY/
|
| Comment by Robert Varga [ 07/Jul/20 ] |
|
Magnesium/Sodium will carry this as a selectable behavior. |