[NETCONF-688] NetConf callhome server reports Created: 19/May/20 Updated: 20/May/20 Resolved: 20/May/20 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | netconf |
| Component/s: | netconf |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Martin Skorupski | Assignee: | Jamo Luhrsen |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Karaf:INFO Karaf Karaf version 4.2.6 Karaf home /opt/opendaylight Karaf base /opt/opendaylight OSGi Framework org.eclipse.osgi-3.12.100.v20180210-1608 JVM Java Virtual Machine OpenJDK 64-Bit Server VM version 11.0.7+10 Version 11.0.7 Vendor AdoptOpenJDK Pid 58 Uptime 44 minutes Process CPU time 2 minutes Process CPU load 0.00 System CPU load 0.02 Open file descriptors 409 Max file descriptors 1,048,576 Total compile time 1 minute Threads Live threads 126 Daemon threads 53 Peak 138 Total started 509 Memory Current heap size 175,775 kbytes Maximum heap size 2,097,152 kbytes Committed heap size 425,984 kbytes Pending objects 0 Garbage collector Name = 'G1 Young Generation', Collections = 38, Time = 0.941 seconds Garbage collector Name = 'G1 Old Generation', Collections = 0, Time = 0.000 seconds Classes Current classes loaded 24,255 Total classes loaded 24,834 Total classes unloaded 579 Operating system Name Linux version 5.3.0-51-generic Architecture amd64 Processors 6 |
||
| Attachments: |
|
| Description |
|
When configuring NetconfCallhomeServer with a new allowed device, the following error is shown in karaf.log: ´´´ 2020-05-19T12:49:44,966 | ERROR | opendaylight-cluster-data-notification-dispatcher-36 | DataTreeChangeListenerActor | 223 - org.opendaylight.controller.sal-clustering-commons - 1.11.0 | member-1-shard-default-config: Error notifying listener org.opendaylight.mdsal.binding.dom.adapter.BindingDOMDataTreeChangeListenerAdapter@4086184e ´´´´ Please see attached file, which contains the related RestConf (bierman) PUT command. It can be reproduced for Soduim-SR1 and Magnesium-SR0.
HTTP PUT: /restconf/config/odl-netconf-callhome-server:netconf-callhome-server
{
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:netconf-callhome-server": {
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:allowed-devices": {
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:device": [
{
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:unique-id": "NTS_Manager",
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:ssh-host-key": "MIIBCgKCAQEAuaf1++Z3N9H17X893pI1pGpXdUOJuOPuFnoZFyjPTY3pqedNpEbvz24SkMynogipxbOc+9iBRtkZda00bLtU1KtJ3r8qy5zkjttZ9YN4kN4qTVTQH/2kKp5CAjyWF4uMNiSiYH3600lgsnTfgOAGp9wevN9JzQs+kp1BzfMO8YF/wZqSjGfcasKHza0OITE92JfIUuiDqki4LVbo+fJogrWWshACg3EweatAfBmblWO2nluF6akRu7hOl2iB8dIrba7UjnTj8R2BP7vYclDn7QUlFzVjoN5bWp1eJOP60ZX/NcnSo7ibPmyc7W8JCluKnNPM1wuVuP/mtYNjqsVqbwIDAQAB",
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:credentials": {
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:username": "netconf",
"odl-netconf-callhome-server:passwords": [
"netconf"
]
}
}
]
}
}
}
The RestConf response is 201, however the callhome function later reports errors during ssh key exchange. Is there something wrong with the json-body?
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 19/May/20 ] |
|
demx8as6, is that ssh key ok? It looks short compared to one I have in a postman collection:
{
"device": {
"unique-id": "December_19_Demo_Device",
"ssh-host-key": "AAAAB3NzaC1yc2EAAAADAQABAAABAQChcF3lc/sHHv+P8fV0X4OKIZvaoQWxjeM+OgLykzuMfisww3+i/9PNb5vWsatftbt7wZKtV9jj0A4mN61thCvt+e7to3Nh93tRgV1XHIUHdbnRoL/8SjHo6NnO+HdF7eiVr4fOXfQpeTiaQ1ghscLFkcGg+olFmBCKGPKBz3oogFZ12ze5KIJQYmOBNI1T/iM4tSRg2ShSB2Sw4A/kduZV7kHo4bnVqsfsZZHLoAojktR174H/mOpGaRd0JvucQPrmc9FP64YyHjHGfU7Y1KaTAALwRQ4zTWl2nRD/io/8/8z96c0ClKTuWukCmaJyuSbaJD0SSSlj9M1EXWw04QLP"
}
}
Not that the Error in the karaf.log is helpful. |
| Comment by Alex Stancu [ 20/May/20 ] |
|
It seems that the host key that you are trying to provide is in PEM format, and ODL expects it in an "ssh format". You can get the public key in a format usable in SSH with this command, in Linux: ssh-keygen -y -f private-key.pem > public-key.pub I've tried to configure ODL with this new key and the error is not there anymore. |
| Comment by Martin Skorupski [ 20/May/20 ] |
|
jluhrsen, thanks for asking the right questions! alex.stancu Thanks for pointing to the different public-key formats! All good -> closed |
| Comment by Martin Skorupski [ 20/May/20 ] |
|
Based on the explainaitions the issue can be considered as "invalid" |