[NETVIRT-110] Missing flows in OPNFV SFC testcase (Boron) Created: 31/Aug/16 Updated: 09/Mar/18 Resolved: 01/Nov/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | netvirt |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | Boron |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | George Paraskevopoulos | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Duplicate | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: Linux |
||
| Attachments: |
flows-failed-test.txt
flows-success-test.txt
karaf (1).log
karaf.log
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| External issue ID: | 6590 | ||||||||
| Description |
|
SFC OPNFV functest failing because of missing flows. The SFC functest boots a client and a server instance and 2 firewall VNFs. One firewall blocks HTTP and the other SSH. The client tries to access the server instance through HTTP and SSH and by modifying the classifier we expect to see the right firewall being active.
In the failed attempt, some flows are missing: 1. table=11, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, nsi=254,nsp=139,in_port=6 actions=load:0x1->NXM_NX_REG0[],move:NXM_NX_NSH_C2[]->NXM_NX_TUN_ID[0..31],resubmit(9,1) 2. table=1, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=40000,nsi=254,nsp=139,reg0=0x1,in_port=9 actions=pop_nsh,goto_table:21 More detailed description: logs and flows in various test phases: |
| Comments |
| Comment by George Paraskevopoulos [ 31/Aug/16 ] |
|
Attachment karaf.log has been added with description: Karaf Log in the failed testcase |
| Comment by George Paraskevopoulos [ 31/Aug/16 ] |
|
Attachment flows-failed-test.txt has been added with description: Flows in failed testcase |
| Comment by George Paraskevopoulos [ 31/Aug/16 ] |
|
Attachment karaf (1).log has been added with description: Karaf log in the successful testcase |
| Comment by George Paraskevopoulos [ 31/Aug/16 ] |
|
Attachment flows-success-test.txt has been added with description: Flows in successful testcase |
| Comment by George Paraskevopoulos [ 31/Aug/16 ] |
|
Check line 255 in karaf log of the failed test: 2016-08-24 08:17:30,852 | INFO | NV-SfcDTL-0 | DelegatingDataTreeListener | 329 - org.opendaylight.netvirt.openstack.net-virt-sfc-impl - 1.3.0.Boron-RC1 | onDataTreeChanged: Received Data Tree Changed Update of Type=DELETE for Key=KeyedInstanceIdentifier {targetType=interface org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.cisco.params.xml.ns.yang.sfc.rsp.rev140701.rendered.service.paths.RenderedServicePath, path=[org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.cisco.params.xml.ns.yang.sfc.rsp.rev140701.RenderedServicePaths, org.opendaylight.yang.gen.v1.urn.cisco.params.xml.ns.yang.sfc.rsp.rev140701.rendered.service.paths.RenderedServicePath[key=RenderedServicePathKey [_name=RspName [_value=Path-red-Path-55]]]]}One SFC receives a DELETE change just after it is created. |