[NETVIRT-1646] Table 45 is missing in default flows. Created: 28/Nov/19 Updated: 17/Dec/19 Resolved: 17/Dec/19 |
|
| Status: | Verified |
| Project: | netvirt |
| Component/s: | ipv6service |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | High |
| Reporter: | Srinivas Rachakonda | Assignee: | Shweta Chaturvedi |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Description |
|
Table 45 is missing in default flows after the switch is connected to ODL.
logs:
|
| Comments |
| Comment by Abhinav Gupta [ 29/Nov/19 ] |
|
Please look into this on priority with inputs from Som and Karthikeyan. |
| Comment by Nishchya Gupta [ 02/Dec/19 ] |
|
Srini, Below are my observation from the log. In CSIT, one of the dpn out of three, is missing default flow for table 45, while other 2 dpn have this below default flow. cookie=0x4000000, duration=476.074s, table=45, n_packets=0, n_bytes=0, priority=0 actions=resubmit(,17) But on observing the rest output of config/opendaylight-inventory:nodes, i can see this flow is present for all 3 nodes. "id": "IPv6TableMissFlow", for "id": "openflow:268328867915857" "id": "openflow:229220768731939" "id": "openflow:229319929507833"
So it looks like ipv6 module is able to put this flow for all three dpns in inventory, but i belive openflow plugin is not able to sync this flow on the dpn. Suggesting to add someone from openflow plugin to look into the issue.
|
| Comment by Shweta Chaturvedi [ 03/Dec/19 ] |
|
Please repro the above issue with openflow debug logs enabled. ->log:set DEBUG org.opendaylight.openflowplugin |
| Comment by Srinivas Rachakonda [ 03/Dec/19 ] |
|
Please monitor the below job:
|
| Comment by Abhinav Gupta [ 03/Dec/19 ] |
|
Shweta_Chaturvedi, job is complete. |
| Comment by Shweta Chaturvedi [ 04/Dec/19 ] |
|
Hello...Was openflow DEBUG level logs enabled for the job as I requested above because I am not seeing any DEBUG logs in karaf. |
| Comment by Srinivas Rachakonda [ 04/Dec/19 ] |
|
Yes it was enabled. Please check the parameters in the build. |
| Comment by Srinivas Rachakonda [ 04/Dec/19 ] |
|
The job failed at a different point and not due to default flow missing. I have rescheduled a new job: |
| Comment by Abhinav Gupta [ 04/Dec/19 ] |
|
SrinivasRachakonda, even if the failure in job 1 is different, let us look into this separately as well. Please raise a new Jira if reqd |
| Comment by Srinivas Rachakonda [ 17/Dec/19 ] |
|
Not seen in the last 10 latest job runs. |