[NETVIRT-934] Allow Address Pairs not working across tenant networks Created: 02/Oct/17 Updated: 18/Aug/20 Resolved: 18/Aug/20 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | netvirt |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | Nitrogen |
| Fix Version/s: | Aluminium, Silicon |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Luis Tomas | Assignee: | Karthikeyan Krishnan |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | feedback | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | 0 minutes | ||
| Time Spent: | 1 day | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 9232 |
| Description |
|
Allowed address pairs (AAP) does not across neutron networks when using ODL as ml2 backend. I tried with both, Nitrogen and Carbon. Steps to reproduce:
Then, if you try to ping VM2 from VM1 it works, i.e., ping 20.0.0.5 from 10.0.0.5. However, if you try to ping the AAP (i.e., 20.0.0.10) from VM1, the traffic does not reach VM2. Actually, it does not even reach the second tenant network (20.0.0.0/24) as the traffic gets to the OVS table 46 and from there it is sent to the controller, therefore not reaching the port where VM2 is connected. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Aswin Suryanarayanan [ 23/Oct/17 ] |
|
Though we create a neutron port and associate its IP an AAP to the vm, the flows related to the port will not be programmed since the port lacks operational state . Also we don't program any FIB flows (table 21) flows for the addition of an AAP. So this IP needs to be learned via subnet route feature in ODL, where controller will ARP for the unkown mac and install the necessary flows. But currently the subnet route feature seems to be broken for non BGP private tenant networks and needs to be fixed. |
| Comment by Sam Hague [ 06/Apr/18 ] |
|
aswinsuryan@gmail.com is this still an issue? |
| Comment by Aswin Suryanarayanan [ 06/Apr/18 ] |
|
shague Yes this issue is yet to be resolved. |
| Comment by Sam Hague [ 04/Oct/18 ] |
|
aswins is this still an issue? |
| Comment by Aswin Suryanarayanan [ 17/Oct/18 ] |
|
yes it is , I am yet to work on it. |
| Comment by Abhinav Gupta [ 25/Nov/19 ] |
|
any update here? |
| Comment by Karthikeyan Krishnan [ 18/Aug/20 ] |
|
Please try to validate the reported use case testing in latest ODL release(Aluminium/Silicon) and open the new ticket if the issue is still persist. |