[NETVIRT-950] [RFE] [IPv6] ping6 support for router interface on a _multi_ network Created: 10/Oct/17 Updated: 14/Jan/20 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | netvirt |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | Oxygen |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Sridhar Gaddam | Assignee: | Srinivas Rachakonda |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Description |
|
Currently, tempest has 8 Scenario tests that validate some IPv6 use-cases (like IPAM) along with ping6 to the neutron router-interface. We have support for ping6 for a dual-stack network as well as IPv6 only network. However, multiprefix networks (i.e., a network with multiple IPv6 subnets) has some gaps and is not officially supported in Netvirt. The following 4 tempest tests fall in the first category (i.e., dual-stack/single IPv6 network use-case) and they are supported. These 4 tests are validated in upstream OpenDaylight CSIT today. test_dualnet_slaac_from_os The next set of 4 tempest tests use multiple IPv6 subnets in a network and they are not supported. This bug is to track the progress of this use-case. test_dualnet_multi_prefix_dhcpv6_stateless |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 09/Apr/18 ] |
|
CSIT patch for this is here: obviously, need this bug fixed before the CSIT patch is helpful. |
| Comment by Abhinav Gupta [ 25/Nov/19 ] |
|
Nishchya, please look into this if any work is required here |
| Comment by Nishchya Gupta [ 14/Jan/20 ] |
|
Srini, please verify and add these if required. |