[OPNFLWPLUG-1046] Migrate OFP from XML to annotation based blueprint Created: 12/Nov/18 Updated: 02/May/19 Resolved: 02/May/19 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | Neon |
| Type: | Improvement | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Michael Vorburger | Assignee: | Michael Vorburger |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
In order to significantly simplify the use of OpenFlowPlugin (OFP) in https://github.com/vorburger/opendaylight-simple, and potentially other non-OSGi standalone Java environments (e.g. https://lighty.io; technically unrelated to opendaylight-simple), the current XML based Blueprint declarations should be switched to annotation based. This is documented on https://wiki.opendaylight.org/view/BestPractices/DI_Guidelines, and has already been successfully done so in a number of other ODL projeccts (notably including genius and netvirt). |
| Comments |
| Comment by Michael Vorburger [ 21/Dec/18 ] |
|
I believe this is nost 9x% fully completed, see Gerrit Reviews - Big Thanks to gobinath (gobinath@ericsson.com ?). There are only two "loose ends" here now: 1. 2. get (something like) OpenFlowPluginModuleTest from opendaylight-simple "upstreamed" to actually be in OFP |
| Comment by Michael Vorburger [ 29/Jan/19 ] |
|
> 2. get (something like) OpenFlowPluginModuleTest from opendaylight-simple "upstreamed" to actually be in OFP I'd still like to do this,but require |