[OPNFLWPLUG-189] of-flow: out_group missing in operational data store (but configured) Created: 11/Jun/14 Updated: 27/Sep/21 Resolved: 13/Jun/14 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Peter Gubka | Assignee: | Anil Vishnoi |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: Linux |
||
| Attachments: |
|
| External issue ID: | 1184 |
| Description |
|
odl: test: mininet 2.1.0 + ovs 2.0.0 steps: 2) GET its operational state (for full details see f111odb.xml in attachment) 4) seen difference |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 11/Jun/14 ] |
|
Attachment f111.xml has been added with description: flow to be configured |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 11/Jun/14 ] |
|
Attachment f111odb.xml has been added with description: operational details of the flow |
| Comment by Anil Vishnoi [ 13/Jun/14 ] |
|
Hi Peter, This seems to similar to the case as i mentioned in mininet> sh ovs-ofctl dump-flows s1 -O OpenFlow13 So there is not out_group element exist in the installed flow. I think possible reason behind OVS ignoring this flow is as follows as per spec "The out_port and out_group fields optionally filter the scope of OFPFC_DELETE and OFPFC_DELETE_STRICT messages by output port and group. If either out_port or out_group contains a value other than OFPP_ANY or OFPG_ANY respectively, it introduces a constraint when matching. This constraint is that the flow entry must contain an output action directed at that port or group. Other constraints such as ofp_match structs and priorities are still used; this is purely an additional constraint. Note that to disable output filtering, both out_port and out_group must be set to OFPP_ANY and OFPG_ANY respectively. These fields are ignored by OFPFC_ADD, OFPFC_MODIFY or OFPFC_MODIFY_STRICT messages" Thanks |