[OPNFLWPLUG-280] The return value of sal-compatibility on flow entry update API is always SUCCESS. Created: 17/Sep/14 Updated: 27/Sep/21 Resolved: 16/Aug/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Hideyuki Tai | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Won't Do | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 1939 |
| Description |
|
The return value of sal-compatibility on flow entry update API was always SUCCESS, even when an AD-SAL application tried to install an inconsistent flow entry with MD-SAL OF plugin via sal-compatibility, but a switch refused the flow entry. When an AD-SAL application executes synchronous methods of the flow entry update API of the sal-compatibility, the sal-compatibility waits for the completion of the flow entry update, and returns control to the caller. Due to this issue, AD-SAL application cannot know if a flow entry update is successful or not. [How to reproduce the issue] To reproduce the issue, let's try to install an inconsistent flow entry. For example, please try to install the following flow entry into OF 1.3 switch using AD-SAL's NB API. { , The above flow entry is inconsistent, because it does not specify IP protocol in match condition, but it has a SET_TP_SRC action. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jozef Gloncak [ 27/Jan/15 ] |
|
I started Karaf in debug mode with
I started my IDE and I connected to remote debug on port 5005 I tried to do rest call (PUT data as you specified to URI as you specified (with my own address of running ODL)). Currently I am quite lost and I can't replicate your problem. Can you please more precisely specify how I could replicate or please notify if my assumption about handling method (addOrModifyFlow) was wrong. |
| Comment by Abhijit Kumbhare [ 10/Nov/15 ] |
|
Hideyuki - is this still an issue or not? |
| Comment by Hideyuki Tai [ 10/Nov/15 ] |
|
(In reply to Abhijit Kumbhare from comment #2) I'm not sure if this issue is fixed or not. That being said, since the sal-compatibility is deleted in Beryllium, I think the issue is not important anymore. |
| Comment by Andrej Leitner [ 16/Aug/16 ] |
|
Since this was not relevant by beryllium, it's not relevant in boron/carbon era too - closing bug. |