[OPNFLWPLUG-501] flows not removed from the switch when 80k flows configured Created: 15/Jun/15 Updated: 27/Sep/21 Resolved: 15/Mar/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Peter Gubka | Assignee: | Jozef Bacigal |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: Linux |
||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||
| External issue ID: | 3735 | ||||||||
| Priority: | High | ||||||||
| Description |
|
tested odl: Lithium RC1 June15 version steps: this is not replicable on demand, it happened once linux-gnu>./get-total-found.sh Total: 2520 The switches with flows are mentioned in the log more times than usual switch [odl@pce-guest32 distribution-karaf-0.3.0-Lithium-RC1-v201506150016]$ grep -r openflow:30 | wc -l I have not foung anythong suspicious, please have a look why this happened |
| Comments |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 15/Jun/15 ] |
|
Attachment stdout.log has been added with description: test stdout |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 15/Jun/15 ] |
|
Attachment karaf.log has been added with description: karaf.log |
| Comment by Abhijit Kumbhare [ 16/Jun/15 ] |
|
From meeting minutes of the meeting June 15:
We will not be fixing this in Lithium release - as it was decided in the meeting this needs more thought and needs to be done in Beryllium. |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 18/Jun/15 ] |
|
the issue was initially observed when testing Lithium RC1 from June 15 for Lithium designed plugin (odl-openflowplugin-flow-services-ui-li) The issue was also observed today while testing distribution-karaf-0.3.0-Lithium-RC1-v201506180115.tar.gz and the old-designed plugin (odl-openflowplugin-flow-services-ui). Log in attachment. |
| Comment by Peter Gubka [ 18/Jun/15 ] |
|
Attachment karaf.log has been added with description: He designed log |
| Comment by Hariharan Sethuraman [ 28/Jul/15 ] |
|
Will start looking into this. |
| Comment by Hariharan Sethuraman [ 07/Aug/15 ] |
|
Hi Peter, Need more information on this bug. 1) Pasted the steps from the bug summary. Could you let me know if the script was running bulk-delete while you restarted the mininet? Michal, <Snipped from bug description> steps: this is not replicable on demand, it happened once linux-gnu>./get-total-found.sh Thanks, |
| Comment by Hariharan Sethuraman [ 17/Aug/15 ] |
|
(In reply to Hariharan Sethuraman from comment #5) I can reproduce it consistently. Please ignore my information request. Thanks. |
| Comment by Hariharan Sethuraman [ 18/Aug/15 ] |
|
From the reproduced setup logs - device got disconnected just before nodes deletion from config data store. So, after deletion the device however reconnects and wont have any effect and flows in device remain intact. This should be covered as part of flow reconciliation. It is difficult to distinguish between the above explained scenario and manually flows programmed directly on the switch case. |
| Comment by Hariharan Sethuraman [ 24/Aug/15 ] |
|
Will be auto-addressed when flow reconciliation is implemented |
| Comment by Abhijit Kumbhare [ 25/Sep/15 ] |
|
Since Hari's comments indicate this will be addressed as part of reconciliation |
| Comment by Abhijit Kumbhare [ 25/Sep/15 ] |
|
Lowering the priority of this. Luis & I were thinking this may not even be a bug - just keeping it to be explored when get a chance in future. |
| Comment by Abhijit Kumbhare [ 10/Nov/15 ] |
|
Muthu, Will this be fixed as part of reconciliation? Abhijit |