[OPNFLWPLUG-610] Unsynchronized use of a TransactionChain seen in openflow clustering CSIT Created: 30/Jan/16 Updated: 27/Sep/21 Resolved: 05/Aug/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Jamo Luhrsen | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Attachments: |
|
| External issue ID: | 5150 |
| Description |
|
The below exception is seen in openflowplugin-csit-3node-clustering-only-beryllium 2016-01-29 10:55:57,032 | ERROR | lt-dispatcher-36 | EntityOwnershipListenerActor | 139 - org.opendaylight.controller.sal-distributed-datastore - 1.3.0.SNAPSHOT | Error notifying listener org.opendaylight.openflowplugin.impl.role.OpenflowOwnershipListener@61295fd4 raced with transacion PingPongTransaction {delegate=org.opendaylight.controller.cluster.databroker.DOMBrokerReadWriteTransaction@1f01b23e} at org.opendaylight.controller.md.sal.dom.broker.impl.PingPongTransactionChain.slowAllocateTransaction(PingPongTransactionChain.java:136)[112:org.opendaylight.controller.sal-broker-impl:1.3.0.SNAPSHOT] |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 30/Jan/16 ] |
|
Attachment 5150.karaf.log.xz has been added with description: karaf.log |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 30/Jan/16 ] |
|
email thread discussing: |
| Comment by Bertrand Low [ 28/Jul/16 ] |
|
Hi Jamo, is this behaviour still observed in recent jenkins runs? thanks, |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 01/Aug/16 ] |
|
(In reply to Bertrand Low from comment #3) Bertrand, you can find the karaf logs of the most recent successful run of this job here: I did a quick search though, and did not see this specific error. It's JamO |
| Comment by Bertrand Low [ 04/Aug/16 ] |
|
thanks for the pointer, JamO. I was also looking through the recent logs and do not see this issue. As such, I propose that we close this bug for now. Thoughts? thanks, |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 04/Aug/16 ] |
|
(In reply to Bertrand Low from comment #5) I have no objections to closing this as unreproducible (presumably fixed, as |
| Comment by Bertrand Low [ 05/Aug/16 ] |
|
ok, thanks JamO. Closing this bug then. |