[OPNFLWPLUG-651] New FRM RETRY mechanism for RCP call Created: 22/Mar/16 Updated: 27/Sep/21 Resolved: 21/Jun/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | OpenFlowPlugin |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Jozef Slezák | Assignee: | Jozef Bacigal |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||
| External issue ID: | 5577 | ||||||||||||
| Description |
|
New FRM calculates the delta between the config modifications. It would not work correctly without retries in negative scenario. We expect that we need to improve FRM while testing&debugging https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5576. |
| Comments |
| Comment by Anil Vishnoi [ 22/Mar/16 ] |
|
Hi Jozef, Where is this new FRM sitting? Can you please explain what this new FRM is doing different then the existing FRM and what's the need for having new FRM and not modifying the existing one ? |
| Comment by Jozef Slezák [ 07/Apr/16 ] |
|
@Anil Vishnoi, there are several advantages of new FRM but the main are: |
| Comment by Shuva Jyoti Kar [ 11/May/16 ] |
|
will not adding barriers between dependent objects take a performance hit in case multiple dependent objects in the order of 1000s are being pushed ? |
| Comment by Andrej Leitner [ 12/May/16 ] |
|
Hi Shuva, We can wait for implicit barrier (or gathered statistics) which stands for lower traffic but higher latency. Or we can send explicit barrier which causes higher traffic but lower latency. The second approach seems more reasonable to me. In addition, we would like to continue with optimization in new FRM and don't wait for barriers in requests where it's not necessary. |
| Comment by Andrej Leitner [ 06/Jun/16 ] |
| Comment by Anil Vishnoi [ 06/Jun/16 ] |
|
Hi Andrej, I can't access this gerrit for some reason. Thanks |
| Comment by Anil Vishnoi [ 06/Jun/16 ] |
|
As per my understanding this new implementation is going to clean up the switch and write all the configuration (flow/group/meter) back when switch connects. How do you handle a situation where flows have specific timeout and they expired when switch was disconnected from the controller. With the current approach, whenever switch will connect back to the controller, it will install the flow again on the switch, which actually is not a correct behavior. |
| Comment by Andrej Leitner [ 13/Jun/16 ] |
|
Hi Anil, |
| Comment by Anil Vishnoi [ 14/Jun/16 ] |
|
Hi Andrej, I looked at the |
| Comment by Muthukumaran Kothandaraman [ 14/Jun/16 ] |
|
HI Andrej, You have mentioned that that the new FRM will use barriers between dependent objects. But, how would the dependent objects be detected ? By doing "full scan of datastore" ? |
| Comment by Andrej Leitner [ 16/Jun/16 ] |
|
@Anil @Muthukumaran |