[PACKTCABLE-14] Inconsistent Behavior on Multiple Sequential Gate Set Created: 28/Jul/16 Updated: 19/Oct/17 Resolved: 08/Sep/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | packetcable |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | unspecified |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Kevin Kershaw | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Cannot Reproduce | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 6296 |
| Description |
|
Inconsistent Behavior on Multiple Sequential Gate Set – it’s unclear where the bug is in this sequence, but it is possible to get ODL into an inconsistent state through a set of sets/deletes: . Set a gate now the set fails. ODL thinks that the gate already exists, even after deleting the gate. The gate does not show up on the operational status report nor the gate report. According to the REST interface, there are no gates. However – the behavior described above is not consistent. It is possible to get ODL into a state where the “error” in #3 above was not present. Set 3 gates, delete the gates again, then set again WITH THE EXACT SAME INFORMATION and the sets SUCCEED. Note: All testing was done on an older ubr7200 series CMTS in the lab. A caveat on the age of the hardware is made here, and it may contribute to some of the artifacts seen here, but it remains that OLD should prevent the bad state that results |
| Comments |
| Comment by Kevin Kershaw [ 18/Aug/16 ] |
|
Gerrit change 43263 to packetcable master |
| Comment by Kevin Kershaw [ 18/Aug/16 ] |
|
(In reply to Kevin Kershaw from comment #1) Resolution info is incorrect - accidentally entered on this issue. |
| Comment by Kevin Kershaw [ 08/Sep/16 ] |
|
Not able to reliably re-create this issue in further testing (by Applied Broadband). Closing this issue for now but could re-open if we run into it in the future. |