BAT SIGNAL on infra issues
(RELENG-113)
|
|
| Status: | Closed |
| Project: | releng |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Sub-task | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Jamo Luhrsen | Assignee: | Jamo Luhrsen |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Description |
|
red dots are what we see on infra aborts. However, there are also other instances this task is for someone to take a reasonable sample of the recent red dots in Based on this data, we can decide how smart we want to get with our bat signal |
| Comments |
| Comment by Jamo Luhrsen [ 21/May/18 ] |
|
some analysis: this job had 13 runs over a month, 2 of which were red dots. One 1 of those red dots was an infra issue. this job had 30 runs over a four day period with two red dots. Neither red dot was a problem with infra. this job also with 30 runs over a four day period had 3 red dots, none of which were infra related. To summarize, that's aprox 120 jobs with 11 red dots, but only 2 were infra related. So, essentially we have a 1.6% rate of infra I'm not sure it's justifiable to spend time on automation to warn the right people if we get an abort, unless someone has |