[SNMP4SDN-13] snmp4sdn features failing to resolve features in Beryllium Created: 04/Dec/15 Updated: 19/Oct/17 Resolved: 16/Feb/16 |
|
| Status: | Verified |
| Project: | snmp4sdn |
| Component/s: | General |
| Affects Version/s: | unspecified |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | Thanh Ha (zxiiro) | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 4720 |
| Description |
|
[WARNING] The POM for org.opendaylight.controller:features-adsal:xml:features:0.10.0-Daily-v201512031659 is missing, no dependency information available [WARNING] The POM for org.opendaylight.controller:features-nsf:xml:features:0.6.0-Daily-v201512031659 is missing, no dependency information available |
| Comments |
| Comment by Thanh Ha (zxiiro) [ 04/Dec/15 ] |
|
Proposed patch: https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/30692/ |
| Comment by Thanh Ha (zxiiro) [ 07/Dec/15 ] |
|
Discussion on this topic can be found on this thread: https://lists.opendaylight.org/pipermail/release/2015-December/004807.html We've also temporarily disabled snmp4sdn from integration and autorelease until this issue is resolved. |
| Comment by Stephen Kitt [ 04/Jan/16 ] |
|
The fix has now been merged. |
| Comment by Vratko Polak [ 04/Jan/16 ] |
|
The fix is not good enough for integration/distribution, as it leads to "Address already in use" BindException in runtime, presumably due to an old AD-SAL based OpenFlow implementation (or something similar) being pulled in. For more info see comments in https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/30272 Ideally, snmp4sdn should use OpenFlow related features from OpenFlowPlugin project of the same cycle (currently Beryllium snapshot). |
| Comment by Stephen Kitt [ 04/Jan/16 ] |
|
Vratko, I'd say that's a different bug... (The features resolve but can't initialise properly.) I've also tried plugging in SingleFeatureTest on snmp4sdn and that breaks in all sorts of ways too. |
| Comment by A H [ 04/Feb/16 ] |
|
Vratko, do we know if this still causes an "Address already in use" BindException in runtime, or has this been fixed as well? |
| Comment by Christine Hsieh [ 16/Feb/16 ] |
|
Aforementioned two bugs and the patch is merged, close this bug report. |