[TRNSPRTPCE-4] The link ROADM to ROADM is not automatically deleted when the ROADM is disconnected Created: 26/Jun/18 Updated: 03/Sep/21 Resolved: 10/Oct/18 |
|
| Status: | Verified |
| Project: | transportpce |
| Component/s: | None |
| Affects Version/s: | None |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Medium |
| Reporter: | Ahmed Triki | Assignee: | Olivier Renais |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Issue Links: |
|
||||||||||||||||
| Description |
|
Add a filed called link status that should be marked as up or down based in the protocol value (up to indicate the pce that path is available for service and down to indicate that path is not available).
superseded by |
| Comments |
| Comment by Dhruv Bhardwaj [ 01/Oct/18 ] |
|
svachhani isn't it already fixed ? |
| Comment by Shweta Vachhani [ 01/Oct/18 ] |
|
Yes it is already fixed. |
| Comment by Dhruv Bhardwaj [ 01/Oct/18 ] |
|
thanks , we can close it then, orenais can you update it and excel sheet after review. |
| Comment by Olivier Renais [ 02/Oct/18 ] |
|
Sorry missed it. Could you point to the gerrit changes associated to that. We had several discussions about this, and my feeling was that we had a workaround , but that at the end the status was not modified. Expected behavior is the following. 1) we create a link with in the OMS attributes a clfi and spanloss-base according to the info we have in an external database that gives the inventory of links. 2) The Controller finds the source and LLDP info on neighbors during topology building. It shall then check consistency between measured span loss and spanloss-base and fills what misses (spanloss-current) if consistent. 3) if a link is broken, from a notification on LLDP status change, it shall only change the admin or operationnal-state of the link, but not delete it, so that we don't need to repopulate the spanloss-base (used for the link engineering) as in first step. |
| Comment by Shweta Vachhani [ 04/Oct/18 ] |
|
The opened issue was addressed by the merge request. Current version of code is adding a new link into network model based on LLDP notification and deleting it from network model based on LLDP notification which was agreed at that tine. Code is already merged into Master. I think we can close this issue and open another one if you think it needs more features. |
| Comment by Olivier Renais [ 10/Oct/18 ] |
|
This bug highlighted prior to integration in Fluorine has been resolved. However proposed solution leads to other issues. Created |