[VTN-100] Issue with Inet Match attributes in Dataflow keytypes Created: 14/Jan/16 Updated: 19/Oct/17 Resolved: 10/Feb/16 |
|
| Status: | Resolved |
| Project: | vtn |
| Component/s: | ODC Driver |
| Affects Version/s: | unspecified |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | ||
| Reporter: | YOGA LAKSHMI SWETHA PAYYAVULA | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Done | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | None | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Environment: |
Operating System: All |
||
| External issue ID: | 4967 |
| Description |
|
ISSUE Scenario: Unable to fetch the Inet-Match attributes in the dataflow keytypes. |
| Comments |
| Comment by YOGA LAKSHMI SWETHA PAYYAVULA [ 03/Feb/16 ] |
|
The Results for the dataflows FETCH operation: VTN DATAFLOWS With portmapping {"dataflows":[{"reason":"success","controller_domain_dataflows":[{"egress_domain_id":"(DEFAULT)","egress_if_name":"if1","ingress_domain_id":"(DEFAULT)","pathinfos":[ {"in_if_name":"if2","in_vnode_name":"vBridge1","out_vnode_name":"vBridge1","status":"normal","vlink_flag":"not_exists","out_if_name":"if1"}, {"in_if_name":"if2","in_vnode_name":"vBridge1","out_vnode_name":"vBridge1","status":"normal","vlink_flag":"exists","out_if_name":"if1"}],"idletimeout":"300","egress_port_name":"s3-eth1","ingress_port_name":"s2-eth1","controller_id":"odc","flow_id":"24","ingress_switch_id":"openflow:2","createdtime":"2147483647","match": {"macsrcaddr":["ca3d.6726.a1bc"],"macdstaddr":["8ee0.a24d.3689"]},"egress_logical_port_id":"PP-openflow:3-s3-eth1","controller_type":"odc","ingress_logical_port_id":"PP-openflow:2-s2-eth1","egress_vnode_name":"vBridge1","ingress_vnode_name":"vBridge1","egress_switch_id":"openflow:3","ingress_if_name":"if2","hardtimeout":"0"}]}]}[root@u12 odcdriver]# VTN_DATAFLOWS for flowfilters, with srcip,destip displayed: {"dataflows":[{"reason":"success","controller_domain_dataflows":[{"egress_domain_id":"(DEFAULT)","egress_if_name":"if1","ingress_domain_id":"(DEFAULT)","pathinfos":[ {"in_if_name":"if2","in_vnode_name":"vBridge1","out_vnode_name":"vBridge1","status":"normal","vlink_flag":"not_exists","out_if_name":"if1"}, {"in_if_name":"if2","in_vnode_name":"vBridge1","out_vnode_name":"vBridge1","status":"normal","vlink_flag":"exists","out_if_name":"if1"}],"idletimeout":"300","egress_port_name":"s3-eth1","ingress_port_name":"s2-eth1","controller_id":"odc","flow_id":"27","ingress_switch_id":"openflow:2","createdtime":"2147483647","match": {"macsrcaddr":["ca3d.6726.a1bc"],"ipproto":["1"],"ipsrcaddr":["49.48.46.48"],"macdstaddr":["8ee0.a24d.3689"],"ipdstaddr":["49.48.46.48"]},"egress_logical_port_id":"PP-openflow:3-s3-eth1","controller_type":"odc","ingress_logical_port_id":"PP-openflow:2-s2-eth1","egress_vnode_name":"vBridge1","ingress_vnode_name":"vBridge1","egress_switch_id":"openflow:3","ingress_if_name":"if2","hardtimeout":"0"}* Connection #0 to host 127.0.0.1 left intact Fixed and merged the bug in the below stable/beryllium patch: |
| Comment by YOGA LAKSHMI SWETHA PAYYAVULA [ 10/Feb/16 ] |
|
PFB the link of this patch in the master branch: |