example.yang
[YANGTOOLS-958] YANG parser does not complain about mandatory node in a default case Created: 27/Feb/19 Updated: 13/Dec/22 |
|
| Status: | Open |
| Project: | yangtools |
| Component/s: | parser |
| Affects Version/s: | 2.0.10 |
| Fix Version/s: | None |
| Type: | Bug | Priority: | Low |
| Reporter: | Peter Verthez | Assignee: | Unassigned |
| Resolution: | Unresolved | Votes: | 0 |
| Labels: | pick-next, pt | ||
| Remaining Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Time Spent: | Not Specified | ||
| Original Estimate: | Not Specified | ||
| Attachments: |
example.yang
|
| Description |
|
We are using version 2.0.11. The YANG parser does not complain when you put a mandatory node in a default case in a choice (see the attached model). We saw this when we had a nested choice in a default case that was mandatory, but actually it is also the case if a default case contains directly a mandatory leaf. According to the RFC this is not allowed. See section https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc7950#section-7.9.3 pyang is giving an error on this: |