[BGPCEP-171] LSP Identifiers TLV is not needed for segment routing LSP

Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:50:21 +0000

I double checked the draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-07. It saids:
“The LSP Identifiers TLV MUST be included in the LSP object in PCRpt messages for RSVP-signaled LSPs.”

So for “SR-signaled LSPs”, LSP Identifiers TLV is not needed in the LSP object of PCRqt message.

While the netork-topology-pcep.yang of Heilum stable version ODL only processes rsvp LSP. So I think it is a bug for not processing SR LSP correctly.

list reported-lsp {
leaf name

{ type string; }

key name;

list path {
leaf lsp-id

{ type rsvp:lsp-id; mandatory true; }

key lsp-id;

uses pcep:path-definition;
}
uses lsp-metadata;

OpenDaylight JIRA

[BGPCEP-171] LSP Identifiers TLV is not needed for segment routing LSP