<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 19:13:05 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[BGPCEP-445] Attempted PCEP Update for a non-delegated LSP sets delegation to true in operational datastore</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/BGPCEP-445</link>
                <project id="10108" key="BGPCEP">bgpcep</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Attempted PCEP Update (with delegate flag=false and explicit inclusion of symbolic path name in the payload) for a non-delegated LSP sets delegation to true in the operational datastore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Symbolic Path name is read from the GET Operation and included as a part of LSP.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Refer the snapshot of the payload sent.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>&lt;p&gt;Operating System: All&lt;br/&gt;
Platform: All&lt;/p&gt;</environment>
        <key id="23685">BGPCEP-445</key>
            <summary>Attempted PCEP Update for a non-delegated LSP sets delegation to true in operational datastore</summary>
                <type id="10104" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                                <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10002">Duplicate</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="ajay1005@gmail.com">Ajay Chhabria</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:53:38 +0000</created>
                <updated>Sun, 3 Mar 2019 11:49:44 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 5 May 2016 13:52:14 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>Bugzilla Migration</version>
                                    <fixVersion>Bugzilla Migration</fixVersion>
                                    <component>PCEP</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="45600" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:53:38 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Attachment Attempted_PCEP_Update_non_delegated_LSP.PNG has been added with description: Attempted PCEP Update for a non-delegated LSP&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45591" author="milos.fabian@pantheon.tech" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:04:31 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The ODL PCE is reporting data from received PcRpt messages.&lt;br/&gt;
Is the LSP PCC-initiated or PCE-initiated?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45592" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 07:12:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The behavior was the same on both PCC and PCE initiated cases.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45593" author="milos.fabian@pantheon.tech" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 09:03:53 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;If possible, could you please attach packet capture?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45594" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:10:43 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Hi Milos,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please find the PCAP files both with PCC and PCE initiated tunnels. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I would like to correct that with PCE initiated tunnels I saw something different:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;1. PCE initiated tunnel &lt;br/&gt;
2. send an update with delegate flag set to false.&lt;br/&gt;
3. Read the operational data the delegation flag was set to false.&lt;br/&gt;
4. Send another update with delegate flag set to false and included symbolic path name.&lt;br/&gt;
5. It threw error type 6 and value 13. The tunnel got DELETED.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Was this behavior expected in the PCE initiated tunnels ? Comments? Thoughts ?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45601" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:11:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Attachment type_bug_5765_PCC_initiated.pcap has been added with description: PCC initiated tunnels PCAP&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45602" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:11:47 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Attachment type_bug_5765_pce_initiated.pcap has been added with description: PCE initiated tunnels PCAP&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45595" author="kevixw@gmail.com" created="Thu, 21 Apr 2016 03:20:56 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This bug has the same behavior, after PCE received the report with delegation flag set to false, the tunnel get deleted in PCE after a while.  As the 2nd update doesn&apos;t have ENDPOINT object in the request, and PCE try to initialize a new tunnel instead of updating an existing tunnel, it throws the exception mandatory object is missing.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45596" author="milos.fabian@pantheon.tech" created="Fri, 22 Apr 2016 11:31:26 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Ajay Chhabria from comment #4)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Hi Milos,&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Please find the PCAP files both with PCC and PCE initiated tunnels. &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; I would like to correct that with PCE initiated tunnels I saw something&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; different:&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; 1. PCE initiated tunnel &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; 2. send an update with delegate flag set to false.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; 3. Read the operational data the delegation flag was set to false.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; 4. Send another update with delegate flag set to false and included symbolic&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; path name.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; 5. It threw error type 6 and value 13. The tunnel got DELETED.&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Was this behavior expected in the PCE initiated tunnels ? Comments? Thoughts&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The &quot;END-POINT Object missing&quot; error is really strange. The second updateLsp (PCInitiate message is send) request should have meaning of &quot;retake delegation&quot; request as described in &lt;a href=&quot;https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-00#section-6&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp-00#section-6&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45597" author="kevixw@gmail.com" created="Wed, 4 May 2016 20:26:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I believe this has the same root cause as &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5763&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5763&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45598" author="milos.fabian@pantheon.tech" created="Thu, 5 May 2016 08:37:33 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Kevin Wang from comment #9)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; I believe this has the same root cause as&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5763&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5763&lt;/a&gt; ?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, this one can be closed as a duplicate of 5763.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="45599" author="kevixw@gmail.com" created="Thu, 5 May 2016 13:52:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;The root cause of this one and bug-5763 are the same, that the retake of delegation is not successfully processed by PCC.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10002">
                    <name>Duplicate</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="duplicates">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="23684">BGPCEP-444</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                            <attachment id="13163" name="Attempted_PCEP_Update_non_delegated_LSP.PNG" size="105716" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Tue, 19 Apr 2016 19:53:38 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="13164" name="type_bug_5765_PCC_initiated.pcap" size="1996" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:11:29 +0000"/>
                            <attachment id="13165" name="type_bug_5765_pce_initiated.pcap" size="2132" author="ajay1005@gmail.com" created="Wed, 20 Apr 2016 21:11:47 +0000"/>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10208" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textfield">
                        <customfieldname>External issue ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>5765</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10201" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:url">
                        <customfieldname>External issue URL</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue><![CDATA[https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5765]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i02cbz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>