<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:02:48 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[INTDIST-115] clean up RFC7950 violations for misc project</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/INTDIST-115</link>
                <project id="10130" key="INTDIST">integration-distribution</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;69 messages below coming from different projects that weren&apos;t quick to identify when&lt;br/&gt;
creating the other sub-tasks for &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/INTDIST-109&quot; title=&quot;thousands of RFC7950 violation log messages in karaf.log&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INTDIST-109&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;INTDIST-109&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;. I think some will fall in to existing projects,&lt;br/&gt;
like OFP or BGP. These are coming from a CSIT job running compatible-with-all:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;div class=&quot;code panel&quot; style=&quot;border-width: 1px;&quot;&gt;&lt;div class=&quot;codeContent panelContent&quot;&gt;
&lt;pre class=&quot;code-java&quot;&gt;
2020-03-23T10:46:05,366 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,367 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,367 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,368 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,379 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:05,380 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:06,801 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,023 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,777 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:07,778 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,759 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,760 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,761 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)withdrawn-routes does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:225:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,761 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)nlri does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:228:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,762 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)segments does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:142:16]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,762 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:166:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,763 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)extended-communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:169:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,764 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)withdrawn-routes does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:225:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)nlri does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:228:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)segments does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:142:16]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,765 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:166:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,766 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)extended-communities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:169:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,769 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,771 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,771 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,772 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,772 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,773 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)address-families does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:144:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,773 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)optional-capabilities does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:112:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:09,774 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,315 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)aggregated-flow-statistics does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:154:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,369 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)batch-update-groups does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:79:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,673 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)experimenter-core-message-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:21:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,687 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)packet-queues does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:36:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,883 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,885 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,891 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)batch-update-meters does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:85:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,975 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,976 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,990 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)control-message does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:25:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:10,998 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)error does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:138:9]
2020-03-23T10:46:11,167 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:298:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:11,170 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)dst-subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;null&lt;/span&gt;:302:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,150 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)pmsi-tunnel}]:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,152 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)opaque-value does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:pmsi-tunnel?revision=2020-01-20)pmsi-tunnel}]:139:24]
2020-03-23T10:46:18,933 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)opendaylight-port-types}]:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,092 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)ports does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:types:port?revision=2013-09-25)opendaylight-port-types}]:195:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,383 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,383 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)ip-port-locator-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:72:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)supported-tunnel-entry does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:overlay?revision=2015-01-05)overlay}]:59:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,384 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)opendaylight-topology-view}]:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,385 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)original-node does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:model:topology:view?revision=2013-10-30)opendaylight-topology-view}]:27:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,485 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)control-message does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:lisp-sb?revision=2015-09-04)odl-lisp-sb}]:25:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:19,793 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)error does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-restconf?revision=2017-01-26)ietf-restconf}]:138:9]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,192 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,192 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,202 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)string-information does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:bmp-message?revision=2020-01-20)bmp-message}]:175:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,257 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)odl-mappingservice}]:298:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,259 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)dst-subscriber-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:lfm:mappingservice?revision=2015-09-06)odl-mappingservice}]:302:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,267 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)cluster-admin}]:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,268 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)member-voting-state does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:controller:md:sal:cluster:admin?revision=2015-10-13)cluster-admin}]:69:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,406 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)aggregated-flow-statistics does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:flow:statistics?revision=2013-08-19)opendaylight-flow-statistics}]:154:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,674 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)experimenter-core-message-item does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:experimenter-mp-message:service?revision=2015-10-20)sal-experimenter-mp-message}]:21:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,677 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)batch-update-meters does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:meters:service?revision=2016-03-16)sal-meters-batch}]:85:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,848 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)batch-update-groups does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:groups:service?revision=2016-03-15)sal-groups-batch}]:79:12]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,852 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-computation}]:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,853 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-description does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:params:xml:ns:yang:path:computation?revision=2020-01-20)path-computation}]:141:8]
2020-03-23T10:46:21,875 | INFO  | features-3-thread-1 | AbstractListStatementSupport     | 499 - org.opendaylight.yangtools.yang-parser-rfc7950 - 4.0.6 | Configuration list (urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)packet-queues does not define any keys in violation of RFC7950 section 7.8.2. While  &lt;span class=&quot;code-keyword&quot;&gt;this&lt;/span&gt; is fine with OpenDaylight, it can cause interoperability issues with other systems [at [{name=(urn:opendaylight:queue:service?revision=2015-03-05)sal-queue}]:36:12]
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="32523">INTDIST-115</key>
            <summary>clean up RFC7950 violations for misc project</summary>
                <type id="10102" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10316&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Sub-task</type>
                            <parent id="32517">INTDIST-109</parent>
                                    <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Medium</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10002">Duplicate</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jluhrsen">Jamo Luhrsen</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:24:29 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:40:00 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:40:00 +0000</resolved>
                                                                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="67982" author="ecelgp" created="Tue, 24 Mar 2020 04:42:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/ViewProfile.jspa?name=jluhrsen&quot; class=&quot;user-hover&quot; rel=&quot;jluhrsen&quot;&gt;jluhrsen&lt;/a&gt; This is nothing to do with distribution, ODL projects should fix their yang models if they care about these logs. You should probably move the tickets to the respective projects.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="67986" author="jluhrsen" created="Tue, 24 Mar 2020 15:29:12 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;agreed that this is a per-project kind of thing, but I was trying to find a way to group everything together&lt;br/&gt;
since they are all related to the same problem. And since we see it the worst in our CSIT running our&lt;br/&gt;
distribution compatible-with-all, I created a parent Jira &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/INTTEST-109&quot; title=&quot;automate ODLPARENT-219 (losing karaf shell on feature:install)&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;INTTEST-109&quot;&gt;INTTEST-109&lt;/a&gt;. But, creating sub-tasks for that&lt;br/&gt;
does not let me put them in their individual projects. I&apos;ll think what&apos;s best to do and take care of it.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="68000" author="jluhrsen" created="Fri, 27 Mar 2020 15:40:00 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Turns out this is because of yangtools checks being too aggressive and that project&lt;br/&gt;
will try to take care of this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1090&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-1090&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i03rpb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>