<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:02:40 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[INTDIST-59] The distribution is too large</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/INTDIST-59</link>
                <project id="10130" key="INTDIST">integration-distribution</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Whenever the distribution artifacts end up larger than 512MB, Nexus uploads are rejected so new artifacts can&apos;t be tested. There&apos;s currently no need for the distribution to be so large, we need to fix the various issues causing the size increase.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is a tracking bug for the various size reduction patches.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>&lt;p&gt;Operating System: All&lt;br/&gt;
Platform: All&lt;/p&gt;</environment>
        <key id="19365">INTDIST-59</key>
            <summary>The distribution is too large</summary>
                <type id="10104" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                                <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="skitt">Stephen Kitt</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 4 Aug 2016 16:26:09 +0000</created>
                <updated>Fri, 20 Oct 2017 10:27:33 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:02:07 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>unspecified</version>
                                                    <component>Features</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>5</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="35067" author="vrpolak" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:04:24 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Confirmed, distribution jobs are failing &lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;0&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; like this:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.snapshot/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-SNAPSHOT/distribution-karaf-0.5.0-20160803.223021-4083.tar.gz&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://nexus.opendaylight.org/content/repositories/opendaylight.snapshot/org/opendaylight/integration/distribution-karaf/0.5.0-SNAPSHOT/distribution-karaf-0.5.0-20160803.223021-4083.tar.gz&lt;/a&gt;. Return code is: 413, ReasonPhrase: Request Entity Too Large.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;span class=&quot;error&quot;&gt;&amp;#91;0&amp;#93;&lt;/span&gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/controller-distribution-boron/339/_console-output.log.gz&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://logs.opendaylight.org/releng/jenkins092/controller-distribution-boron/339/_console-output.log.gz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35068" author="jluhrsen" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:29:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;please do not close this bug until the nexus file size limit is reverted to 500M.  please see tsc meeting minutes from 8/4/2016 for more info.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35069" author="ecelgp" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:50:52 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;We should also monitor this job so we never lose the offline deploy:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-distribution-offline-boron/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-distribution-offline-boron/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35070" author="jluhrsen" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 17:52:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Luis Gomez from comment #3)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; We should also monitor this job so we never lose the offline deploy:&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;a href=&quot;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/view/integration/job/integration-&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; distribution-offline-boron/&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;can we just make the distribution-check that happens on the gerrits run&lt;br/&gt;
in offline mode?  then no patches could come in to bring this offline bug back?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35071" author="vrpolak" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:00:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&amp;gt; can we just make the distribution-check that happens on the gerrits run&lt;br/&gt;
in offline mode?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;+1&lt;br/&gt;
But wait until Bugs 6187 and this one are verified to be fixed.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35072" author="ecelgp" created="Thu, 4 Aug 2016 18:03:01 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I think it would be possible yes and we would save 1 job.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35073" author="skitt@redhat.com" created="Fri, 5 Aug 2016 08:37:34 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Upgrading to Karaf 3.0.7 shrinks the distribution by ~70MB (resulting in a 499MB tarball). Comparing the 3.0.6 and 3.0.7 distributions reveals that the latter drops the following duplicated JARs (amongst others):&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Bouncy Castle 1.49 (we&apos;re using 1.54)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;CXF (again; do we actually need it?)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Groovy&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;GSON 2.2.2&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Guava 13.0, 13.0.1, 17.0 (these are ~2MB JARs)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Guice&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Hazelcast 1.9.4&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Jackson 2.4.1 (we&apos;re using 2.3.2)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;JClouds&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;Netty 3.3.1, 3.9.1 and 4.0.19 (we&apos;re using 4.0.37)&lt;/li&gt;
	&lt;li&gt;WSS4J&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;


&lt;p&gt;A number of ServiceMix bundles disappear too.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35074" author="skitt@redhat.com" created="Fri, 5 Aug 2016 13:24:03 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&quot;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43138&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43138&lt;/a&gt; drops one extraneous version of Jackson (from Atrium).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35075" author="ecelgp" created="Fri, 5 Aug 2016 14:24:13 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Very good Stephen, what is the plan for karaf 3.0.7 update?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35076" author="skitt@redhat.com" created="Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:15:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Luis Gomez from comment #9)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Very good Stephen, what is the plan for karaf 3.0.7 update?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I&apos;m hoping &lt;a href=&quot;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/40818&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/40818&lt;/a&gt; will pass distribution-check now that &lt;a href=&quot;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43139&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/43139&lt;/a&gt; has been merged (once the merge job has completed...). After that I&apos;d like to get a CSIT run, and given the late stage in the release we might want a TSC waiver or something like that...&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35077" author="ecelgp" created="Fri, 5 Aug 2016 15:18:03 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;OK, let me know if i can help with anything.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35078" author="skitt@redhat.com" created="Mon, 8 Aug 2016 07:24:54 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Luis Gomez from comment #11)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; OK, let me know if i can help with anything.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We have a complete test-integration build, &lt;a href=&quot;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/integration-patch-test-boron/24/&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;https://jenkins.opendaylight.org/releng/job/integration-patch-test-boron/24/&lt;/a&gt; &#8212; does it look OK?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35079" author="vrpolak" created="Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:26:38 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Is the size still at blocking level? As in, should we postpone Boron release until it improves (and by how much)?&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35080" author="skitt@redhat.com" created="Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:44:05 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Vratko Pol&#225;k from comment #13)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; Is the size still at blocking level? As in, should we postpone Boron release&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; until it improves (and by how much)?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;No, the RC1 distribution is only 417.41MB in size (as a gzipped tarball).&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35081" author="jluhrsen" created="Wed, 24 Aug 2016 15:46:28 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;(In reply to Stephen Kitt from comment #14)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; (In reply to Vratko Pol&#225;k from comment #13)&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; Is the size still at blocking level? As in, should we postpone Boron release&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &amp;gt; until it improves (and by how much)?&lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; &lt;br/&gt;
&amp;gt; No, the RC1 distribution is only 417.41MB in size (as a gzipped tarball).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The recent size is aprox 412M which is below our previous blocking level&lt;br/&gt;
of 512M which was relaxed in order to unblock us.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I also need to comment here that we should not be closing this bug until&lt;br/&gt;
we confirm that our nexus upload size limit has been reduced back to its&apos;&lt;br/&gt;
original 512M level.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35082" author="vrpolak" created="Wed, 24 Aug 2016 18:47:11 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Current sizes:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;distribution-karaf-0.5.0-Boron-RC1.zip : 440465781 bytes.&lt;br/&gt;
distribution-karaf-0.6.0-20160824.182041-339.zip : 431629240 bytes.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="35083" author="agrimberg" created="Thu, 25 Aug 2016 17:02:07 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;As of 2016-08-25 09:48 (PDT) the upload limit for nexus has been reduced back to 512MB as stipulated. Since I&apos;ve been asked to mark this as RESOLVED upon the completion of this task, I&apos;m now doing so.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10208" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textfield">
                        <customfieldname>External issue ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6341</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10201" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:url">
                        <customfieldname>External issue URL</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue><![CDATA[https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6341]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i01lnz:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>