https://jira.opendaylight.org This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.20.10 820010 22-06-2022 https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/INTPAK-10 integration-packaging <p>Some RPM installs fails with:</p> <blockquote> <p>Error: nothing provides mono(System) = 2.0.0.0 needed by opendaylight-8.0.0-0.1.20170901snap214.el7.noarch<br/> (try to add '--allowerasing' to command line to replace conflicting packages)</p></blockquote> <p>This only seems to happen for RPMs built on ODL infra, not RPMs built on the CentOS Community Build System. There is suspicious looking RPM repo-add configuration in the Packer build logic for the VM we use when building RPMs.</p> <p>RelEng/Builder's Packer config for the java-builder VM (`packer/provision/java-builder.sh`):</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> # Needed <span class="code-keyword">for</span> vsemprovider build in vtn project to enable C# compilation. rpm --<span class="code-keyword">import</span> <span class="code-quote">"http:<span class="code-comment">//keyserver.ubuntu.com/pks/lookup?op=get&amp;search=0x3FA7E0328081BFF6A14DA29AA6A19B38D3D831EF"</span> </span># Add the mono tools repository yum-config-manager -y --add-repo http:<span class="code-comment">//download.mono-project.com/repo/centos/ </span># Install the mono toolchain and nuget yum -y install mono-complete nuget </pre> </div></div> <p>Need to create a test to verify if a package has this dep issue or not. Then likely need to build in a mock env to isolate RPM build from underlying system better.</p> <p><a href="https://trello.com/c/ftWr5IKw/602-do-rpm-builds-in-mock-to-avoid-unwanted-deps-nothing-provides-mono-2000-error" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">Imported from Trello</a></p> INTPAK-10

Fix "nothing provides mono 2.0.0.0" error for ODL-infra built RPMs

Bug High Closed Done Daniel Farrell Daniel Farrell Tue, 31 Oct 2017 18:54:28 +0000 Mon, 15 Jan 2018 20:33:37 +0000 Tue, 5 Dec 2017 17:42:25 +0000 0 1 <p>PoC fix, but not really good long-term as it's a blacklist that needs to be maintained. Still need to test but the various issues marked as blocking this make it difficult.</p> <p><a href="https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66165/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/66165/</a></p> <p>Related docs:</p> <p><a href="https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:AutoProvidesAndRequiresFiltering</a></p> <p>This sandbox run shows the proposed test pass with the proposed fix, whereas it fails before the proposed fix.</p> <p><a href="https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/jenkins091/packaging-build-rpm-oxygen/16/console.log.gz" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://logs.opendaylight.org/sandbox/jenkins091/packaging-build-rpm-oxygen/16/console.log.gz</a></p> Blocks INTPAK-46 INTPAK-107 Development Rank 0|i03707: