<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:05:58 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[LACP-7] In scenarios wherein the message exchange between switch &amp; controller results in OF version set to OF1.0, the LACP module should throw up an error/warning message instead of processing the LACP packets</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/LACP-7</link>
                <project id="10135" key="LACP">lacp</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;In case of creating an topology with switch version set to OF 1.0 &amp;amp; the controller OF version set to 1.3, the message exchange between them results in the OF version being set to 1.0. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;In the above case, the LACP module should throw up an error or warning with info. &quot;OF version mismatch&quot; and also it should not add LACP flows to take the LACP PDU&apos;s to the controller. This will result in the LAG being created on the LACP module, but then the corresponding group wouldn&apos;t have been created on controller/switch side as the group programming is introduced only with OF version 1.3&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;mininet&amp;gt; sh ovs-ofctl -O Openflow10 dump-flows s1&lt;br/&gt;
NXST_FLOW reply (xid=0x4):&lt;br/&gt;
 cookie=0x3000000000000000, duration=9.985s, table=0, n_packets=16, n_bytes=1984, idle_age=5, priority=5,dl_dst=01:80:c2:00:00:02,dl_type=0x8809 actions=CONTROLLER:65535   &amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;&amp;lt;lacp flow entry is added. This will result in unnecessarily taking the packets to the controller.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>&lt;p&gt;Operating System: Linux&lt;br/&gt;
Platform: All&lt;/p&gt;</environment>
        <key id="28227">LACP-7</key>
            <summary>In scenarios wherein the message exchange between switch &amp; controller results in OF version set to OF1.0, the LACP module should throw up an error/warning message instead of processing the LACP packets</summary>
                <type id="10104" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                                <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10001">Won&apos;t Do</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="kalaiselvi_k@dell.com">Kalaiselvi</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="mahesh_manivasagam@dell.com">Mahesh Manivasagam</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 28 May 2015 09:09:49 +0000</created>
                <updated>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:33:04 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Thu, 18 Jun 2015 06:33:04 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>unspecified</version>
                                                    <component>General</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="59208" author="mahesh_manivasagam@dell.com" created="Thu, 28 May 2015 09:50:43 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Issue seen on latest integration build(1901)&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="59209" author="kalaiselvi_k@dell.com" created="Fri, 5 Jun 2015 10:09:30 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Openflow plugin does not share the switch&apos;s openflow version through notifications or in the data-store information.&lt;br/&gt;
So, LACP does not differentiate between openflow1.0 and openflow1.3 switches.&lt;br/&gt;
The information that for LACP to work properly switches have to support openflow1.3 will be published in the LACP user guide document.&lt;br/&gt;
Lacp feature will not throw any warning and avoid flow installation for switches in openflow1.0. LACP aggregate interfaces will be created for the switches. but the lag will not be informed to switches via the group table entries for these switches.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10208" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textfield">
                        <customfieldname>External issue ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>3409</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10201" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:url">
                        <customfieldname>External issue URL</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue><![CDATA[https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3409]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10206" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Issue Type</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10300"><![CDATA[Bug]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10202" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Priority</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10301"><![CDATA[Normal]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i034db:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>