https://jira.opendaylight.org This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.20.10 820010 22-06-2022 https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/MDSAL-690 mdsal <p>Our use of Builder concept in generated code has the unfortunate effect that callers of a particular build() method cannot be identified in IDEs, as it will list all builders.</p> <p>Rather than pulling in this concept, just document the build() method without the tie-in of Builder. Note that builders will need to pick up the Mutable interface to retain the marker.</p> MDSAL-690

Do not reference concepts.Builder in builders

Improvement High Resolved Done Ivan Hrasko Robert Varga pt Mon, 27 Sep 2021 13:27:32 +0000 Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:25:54 +0000 Mon, 17 Jan 2022 13:25:54 +0000 9.0.0 Binding codegen 0 2 <p>Does this mean that we are going to replace:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>public class FooBuilder implements org.opendaylight.yangtools.concepts.Builder&lt;Foo&gt;</pre> </div></div> <p>with:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>public class FooBuilder implements IFooBuilder</pre> </div></div> <p>meaning that every Builder has its own interface?</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre>public interface IFooBuilder { Foo build(); }</pre> </div></div> <p>Nope, no new interfaces, just drop the 'implements ... Builder&lt;Foo&gt;' part.</p> Blocks YANGTOOLS-1327 MDSAL-717 Development Epic Link YANGTOOLS-1322 Rank 0|i03znr: