<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:14:37 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[NETCONF-281] Forgotten config DS changes when no clustered topology owner</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-281</link>
                <project id="10142" key="NETCONF">netconf</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;When there is no Owner for topology-manager entity, changes in config topology-netconf are not processed. When new owner appears, it does not examine state of topology-netconf. That means some user-configured connections are never opened, and some user-deconfigured connections are never torn down.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;As lack of owner is not visible in Restconf output, current users can never be sure whether their changes will ever be applied.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Similar behavior was present in Openflowplugin project for Forwarding Rules Manager (FRM). They created FRS, S meaning Synchronize.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;For Netconf, I recommend to add synchronization ability directly to odl-netconf-clustered_topology.&lt;br/&gt;
And possibly odl-netconf-topology as well, in order to re-establish previously configured connections after reboot in single node scenario.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>&lt;p&gt;Operating System: All&lt;br/&gt;
Platform: All&lt;/p&gt;</environment>
        <key id="21294">NETCONF-281</key>
            <summary>Forgotten config DS changes when no clustered topology owner</summary>
                <type id="10104" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                                <status id="10003" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/status_generic.gif" description="">Confirmed</status>
                    <statusCategory id="2" key="new" colorName="blue-gray"/>
                                    <resolution id="-1">Unresolved</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="vrpolak">Vratko Polak</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Wed, 21 Sep 2016 13:56:51 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 13 Aug 2019 07:38:39 +0000</updated>
                                                                            <component>netconf</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="39653" author="jmorvay@cisco.com" created="Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:35:48 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This should be fixed in new refactored clustered netconf topology implementation.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Please see &lt;a href=&quot;https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-277&quot; title=&quot;Use singleton service in clustered netconf topology&quot; class=&quot;issue-link&quot; data-issue-key=&quot;NETCONF-277&quot;&gt;&lt;del&gt;NETCONF-277&lt;/del&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="39654" author="vrpolak" created="Mon, 17 Oct 2016 10:58:39 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;INVALID means the reported issue was a user error and not a real Bug.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;If this is will be fixed together with another Bug, this should be kept CONFIRMED or perhaps marked as DUPLICATE.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="39655" author="jmorvay@cisco.com" created="Mon, 17 Oct 2016 11:05:21 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Sorry,&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;We will have to try to replicate this on new clustered topology to see if the bug is still present..&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10000">
                    <name>Blocks</name>
                                                                <inwardlinks description="is blocked by">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="21290">NETCONF-277</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </inwardlinks>
                                    </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10207" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textarea">
                        <customfieldname>External References</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>netconf_cluster_stress_txt_topology_owner_ha_check_for_connector_leak</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10208" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textfield">
                        <customfieldname>External issue ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>6774</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10201" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:url">
                        <customfieldname>External issue URL</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue><![CDATA[https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6774]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10206" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Issue Type</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10300"><![CDATA[Bug]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i01xkn:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>