<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:16:06 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[NETCONF-862] Add changed-leaf-nodes-only subscription extension</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETCONF-862</link>
                <project id="10142" key="NETCONF">netconf</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;There is a need for an extension which has similar behavior to odl-leaf-nodes-only.&lt;br/&gt;
The nodes which have the same data written into them are not contained in the final notification. For that we perform additional check which is costing us CPU cycles hence we do not modify the original behavior rather we are making this new extension.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment></environment>
        <key id="35255">NETCONF-862</key>
            <summary>Add changed-leaf-nodes-only subscription extension</summary>
                <type id="10103" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10311&amp;avatarType=issuetype">New Feature</type>
                                            <priority id="3" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/priorities/major.svg">Medium</priority>
                        <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="ppuskar">Peter Pu&#353;k&#225;r</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="ppuskar">Peter Pu&#353;k&#225;r</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Thu, 24 Feb 2022 12:11:33 +0000</created>
                <updated>Wed, 26 Jul 2023 00:16:33 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Mon, 2 Jan 2023 18:04:14 +0000</resolved>
                                                    <fixVersion>5.0.0</fixVersion>
                                    <component>restconf-nb</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>2</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="71416" author="rovarga" created="Fri, 19 Aug 2022 22:27:29 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;This change will change the semantics of the extension. Performing leaf-level comparison, which incurs significant CPU penalty vs. the current spec.&lt;br/&gt;
As such, I believe this needs to be done as a separate extension with the semantics specified.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="71419" author="JIRAUSER14307" created="Mon, 22 Aug 2022 06:53:23 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Okay, I can make this separate extension.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;One more question though, the problem for this lies in the upstream implementation as the DataTreeCandidateNode that is passed down to serializeLeafNodesOnly is NormalizedNodeDataTreeCandidateNode (can it be other implementation?) which always returns ModificationType.WRITE in its getModificationType() implementation, even for the NormalizedNode which has same Before and After data.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Should the semantics in the upstream implementation stay as it is and we adjust to that as downstream user here?&#160;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                <issuelinks>
                            <issuelinktype id="10003">
                    <name>Relates</name>
                                            <outwardlinks description="relates to">
                                        <issuelink>
            <issuekey id="37143">NETCONF-1100</issuekey>
        </issuelink>
                            </outwardlinks>
                                                        </issuelinktype>
                    </issuelinks>
                <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i041nb:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>