https://jira.opendaylight.org This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.20.10 820010 22-06-2022 https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/NETVIRT-1055 netvirt <p>IPV6 address not getting assigned until reboot the VM Manually.</p> <p>Steps:</p> <ol> <li>Create Network,Subnet withSLAAC, and Port.</li> <li>Boot all VM</li> <li>Create Router and add interface to it.</li> <li>Verify IPV6 addree assigned.</li> </ol> <p>Result:</p> <p> </p> <p>    All flows programmed.</p> <p>    Fib-shows entries.</p> <p>    No IPV6 address assigned to interface.</p> <p> </p> <p>Workaround:</p> <p> </p> <p>  Reboot the VM</p> NETVIRT-1055

IPV6 address not getting assigned until reboot the VM Manually

Bug Highest Verified Done Somashekar B RajaRajan Manickam VPNV6 Thu, 4 Jan 2018 11:30:07 +0000 Mon, 14 May 2018 07:22:09 +0000 Fri, 23 Mar 2018 09:33:25 +0000 Oxygen Oxygen 0 4 <p>From the flow-dumps given flows are all looking proper, looks like something to do with the VM.</p> <p>Only upon reboot, the required packets are coming out of the VM is what I feel</p> <p>IPV6 address getting assigned to VM's and able to ping among them.</p> <p>Unable to reproduce the issue with karaf-0.8.0-20180104.014256-1201.</p> <p>Devstackversion used : newton</p> <p>Hi Nishchya,</p> <p> </p> <p> Please do not close any BUG.. If it is not tested in latest devstack version(pike),</p> <p> </p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>RajaRajan</p> <p>Below patch handles this issue.<br/> <a href="https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/69786/" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/69786/</a></p> <p>Problem:<br/> ------------<br/> RA was constructed and sent with destination as unspecified address (:<img class="emoticon" src="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/emoticons/smile.png" height="16" width="16" align="absmiddle" alt="" border="0"/> instead of All-nodes-address (FF02::1).</p> <p>It has been corrected in the patch.</p> <p>The issue was only with unsolicited RA messages. This is fixed with the patch mentioned above.</p> <p>RA in response to RS had no issues.</p> Development Priority Rank 0|i039an: