<!-- 
RSS generated by JIRA (8.20.10#820010-sha1:ace47f9899e9ee25d7157d59aa17ab06aee30d3d) at Wed Feb 07 20:36:06 UTC 2024

It is possible to restrict the fields that are returned in this document by specifying the 'field' parameter in your request.
For example, to request only the issue key and summary append 'field=key&field=summary' to the URL of your request.
-->
<rss version="0.92" >
<channel>
    <title>OpenDaylight JIRA</title>
    <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org</link>
    <description>This file is an XML representation of an issue</description>
    <language>en-us</language>    <build-info>
        <version>8.20.10</version>
        <build-number>820010</build-number>
        <build-date>22-06-2022</build-date>
    </build-info>


<item>
            <title>[OVSDB-327] QoS and Queues not removed from operational after delete when using OVS 2.5 docker image</title>
                <link>https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/OVSDB-327</link>
                <project id="10158" key="OVSDB">ovsdb</project>
                    <description>&lt;p&gt;Bug was observed in southbound-it. Specifically in SouthboundIT.testAddDeleteQueue and SouthboundIT.testAddDeleteQoS but also in other tests. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Root cause is code in the execute method of OvsdbQoSRemovedCommand and OvsdbQueueRemovedCommand. The deleteQoS/Queue methods are only called if the update notification contains modifications to the OpenVSwitch table. My guess is that in 2.5 OVS optimizes the notification out for the OpenVSwitch table because although an update was sent to OVS, data was not changed.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
                <environment>&lt;p&gt;Operating System: All&lt;br/&gt;
Platform: All&lt;/p&gt;</environment>
        <key id="22019">OVSDB-327</key>
            <summary>QoS and Queues not removed from operational after delete when using OVS 2.5 docker image</summary>
                <type id="10104" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/secure/viewavatar?size=xsmall&amp;avatarId=10303&amp;avatarType=issuetype">Bug</type>
                                                <status id="5" iconUrl="https://jira.opendaylight.org/images/icons/statuses/resolved.png" description="A resolution has been taken, and it is awaiting verification by reporter. From here issues are either reopened, or are closed.">Resolved</status>
                    <statusCategory id="3" key="done" colorName="green"/>
                                    <resolution id="10000">Done</resolution>
                                        <assignee username="-1">Unassigned</assignee>
                                    <reporter username="jhershbe">Josh Hershberg</reporter>
                        <labels>
                    </labels>
                <created>Mon, 4 Apr 2016 08:32:21 +0000</created>
                <updated>Tue, 29 May 2018 14:58:55 +0000</updated>
                            <resolved>Tue, 5 Apr 2016 06:15:45 +0000</resolved>
                                    <version>unspecified</version>
                                                    <component>Southbound.Open_vSwitch</component>
                        <due></due>
                            <votes>0</votes>
                                    <watches>3</watches>
                                                                                                                <comments>
                            <comment id="41394" author="jhershbe" created="Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:39:42 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Patch is on it&apos;s way in&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41395" author="jhershbe" created="Mon, 4 Apr 2016 11:44:14 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;Changing the logic to no longer depend on there also being changes to the OpenVSwitch table solves this issue. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, I am not sure if the issue is caused by version differences in OVS or because the specific instance of 2.1 (running on the &quot;davetocker&quot; docker) has a bunch of the optional fields of OpenVSwitch table set, e.g., system_type, that are not set on the 2.5 instance. Not sure if it makes too much of a practical difference either way but thought it worth documenting.&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                            <comment id="41396" author="jhershbe" created="Mon, 4 Apr 2016 13:30:49 +0000"  >&lt;p&gt;I wonder if this is related to this: &lt;br/&gt;
&lt;a href=&quot;http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/git/2015-September/007475.html&quot; class=&quot;external-link&quot; target=&quot;_blank&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow noopener&quot;&gt;http://openvswitch.org/pipermail/git/2015-September/007475.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</comment>
                    </comments>
                    <attachments>
                    </attachments>
                <subtasks>
                    </subtasks>
                <customfields>
                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_11400" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugins.jira-development-integration-plugin:devsummary">
                        <customfieldname>Development</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            
                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10208" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:textfield">
                        <customfieldname>External issue ID</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>5648</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                <customfield id="customfield_10201" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:url">
                        <customfieldname>External issue URL</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue><![CDATA[https://bugs.opendaylight.org/show_bug.cgi?id=5648]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                            <customfield id="customfield_10206" key="com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.customfieldtypes:select">
                        <customfieldname>Issue Type</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                                <customfieldvalue key="10300"><![CDATA[Bug]]></customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                        <customfield id="customfield_10000" key="com.pyxis.greenhopper.jira:gh-lexo-rank">
                        <customfieldname>Rank</customfieldname>
                        <customfieldvalues>
                            <customfieldvalue>0|i0221r:</customfieldvalue>

                        </customfieldvalues>
                    </customfield>
                                                                                                                                                                                </customfields>
    </item>
</channel>
</rss>