https://jira.opendaylight.org This file is an XML representation of an issue en-us 8.20.10 820010 22-06-2022 https://jira.opendaylight.org/browse/YANGTOOLS-912 yangtools <p>The declaration</p> <div class="code panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="codeContent panelContent"> <pre class="code-java"> InputStatement <span class="code-keyword">extends</span> DeclaredStatement&lt;QName&gt; </pre> </div></div> <p>violates API contract of ModelStatement around argument type, which is:</p> <div class="preformatted panel" style="border-width: 1px;"><div class="preformattedContent panelContent"> <pre> * @param &lt;A&gt; Argument type ({@link Void} if statement does not have argument.)</pre> </div></div> YANGTOOLS-912

{Input,Output}Statement definition violates ModelStatement API contract

Bug High Resolved Won't Do Unassigned Robert Varga Tue, 23 Oct 2018 19:51:44 +0000 Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:17:47 +0000 Thu, 8 Jul 2021 14:17:47 +0000 parser 0 1 <p>Neither input nor output take an argument, hence they should be DeclaredStatement&lt;Void&gt; instead.</p> <p>This went in <a href="https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/18038/12/yang/yang-model-api/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/yangtools/yang/model/api/stmt/InputStatement.java" class="external-link" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">https://git.opendaylight.org/gerrit/#/c/18038/12/yang/yang-model-api/src/main/java/org/opendaylight/yangtools/yang/model/api/stmt/InputStatement.java</a> . Rectifying this will be a major undertaking, as there are interface changes required to support the difference.</p> <p>Current design is forced on us by input/output being schema tree statements, hence they inherently have an implied QName argument.</p> Blocks YANGTOOLS-908 YANGTOOLS-1066 Development Rank 0|i03js7: