Details
-
Bug
-
Status: Resolved
-
Resolution: Done
-
unspecified
-
None
-
None
-
Operating System: All
Platform: All
-
2162
Description
actually the gate id is not available before the gateSet since it's the CMTS how returns it, what are the constraints behind the use of the ID?
create cmts --> provider —> consumer ( cmts )
id <—provider
right. are the calls blocking or async until the sequence is finished?
in fact, i think the provider could support both generate id AND provide id in the URI. ==> as far as i know it's a URI for a Rest access => one way flow unless there is a way to return back the values ?
for generated json can be returned? the osgi calls are async?
what does the provider support now according to the code? => create/delete/update (untested )
cmts and flows that are best effort?
default match = ipv4-destination ? default action = best effort => YES
in our case it feels awkward to make the application generate cmts id’s and flow ids. what seems right is ...
create flow -> cmts
id <—cmts
in fact could be the gate id. in the cmts case the provider could do a db like auto index
create cmts --> provider —> cmts
id <—provider
does this work for us or does the augmentation require us to work differently? in fact, i think the provider could support both generate id AND provide id in the URI.